Back to Front Page

 

Back to News

 

Back to Court Proceedings

 

Part 3

CONTINUATION OF CROSS-EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF WITNESS,

REV. BAZYL ZAWIERUCHA,

BY MR. SMORODSKY:

 

 

    Q. -- who makes the nominations?

    A. Okay. Uh-huh. That the Primate, who is the Prime Hierarch of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, consulting the Exarch of the

      Ecumenical Patriarchate in America will submit the slate of candidates for the office of Bishop or Metropolitan to the Sobor.

    Q. That's different than what the Constitution says, does it not? Is it not?

P40 A. This is not what the Constitution says.

    Q. I understand that. Now, the question is why, in the testimony that you gave as to the structure, there is no reference to the

         Ecumenical Patriarchate?

    A. At the time of the writing of the Constitution, we were -- why there was no reference to it?

    Q. Yeah. Why? Why was there no reference, Father?

    A. I assume because at the time the Church was not under the omophorion of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. I do not know.

      Q. Father, let's do it this way: You were testifying and you were taking notes and you have all marked up from the Constitution of

         the Sobor of October of 1998, at which you testified you were the secretary, correct?

     A. Yes. Right.

     Q. That has been marked P-20. I show you, Father, document D-57, which is the Points of Agreement. When were they entered

           into?

     A. I think they were entered into prior to the Sobor of 1998.

     Q. Would it be more --

     A. Okay.

     Q. 19 --

     A. December, 1994.

     Q. -- December of 1994.

     THE COURT: Let me -- if I may interrupt? What exactly are Points of Agreement? Can you describe what this document is?

     THE WITNESS: These are headed here Points of Agreement between the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in the U.S.A. and the

          Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.

     Q. Now, that's an agreement that was made between the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States and the Ecumenical

          Patriarchate of Constantinople, correct? It's a contract, an understanding, correct?

     A. Correct.

     Q. How did that contract affect the structure of the UOC-USA that you testified to?

     A. From the Points of Agreement, it does – what it does, it underlines what we quoted here in paragraph two of Article One; that

          the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of America keeps the canons, the dogmas, and structure of the Ecumenical Orthodox

          Church.

     Q. Now, Father, again, the sentence right after that says –

     A. After, it says autocephalous.

     Q. That's correct.

     A. Independent, in all matters of life --

     Q. In all matters of life, correct?

     A. -- and government.

     Q. And government. Does the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople recognize the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United

          States as autocephalous?

     A. Is it listed as an autocephalous church?

     Q. Does it recognize it as being autocephalous, Father?

 

     A. It is -- I wouldn't -- I don't think it is recognized as autocephalous as --

     Q. As that term is understood in the ecclesiastical world?

     MR. REHILL: If I may, your Honor, the rest of the Father's answer is as recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarch. But I was

           standing to suggest, Mr. Smorodsky, if you would allow the witness to finish his answer rather than interrupting in the middle

           of sentences, it would make it clearer, and I don't think  it's really necessary to yell at Father.

     MR. SMORODSKY: I'm sorry.

     THE COURT: It's done with enthusiasm rather than anything else.

     MR. SMORODSKY: That is correct.

     Q. I apologize, my style, if it offends you, Father?

     A. No, no.

     MR. REHILL: It offends me.

     MR. SMORODSKY: If it offends you, I apologize.

     THE COURT: Well, we have the other problem. The Court Reporter is obviously – this language is –

     MR. SMORODSKY: I recognize it, Judge, and I will slow down.

     THE COURT: It would be helpful for me taking notes also --

     MR. SMORODSKY: Thank you, sir.

     THE COURT: -- since many of the terms and spelling are unfamiliar to me also.

     BY MR. SMORODSKY:

     Q. The question that I asked, Father, was does the Ecumenical Patriarch recognize the Ukrainian Autocephalous Church of the

          United States of America or the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America as autocephalous?

A.   You know, the whole issue -- yes. There is an internal contradiction within this second paragraph of Article One. There is an

      internal contradiction, meaning that if the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America, as it says here, keeps

      the dogmas, canons, structure, and worship of the Holy Ecumenical Orthodox Church, okay, which in order to be an

     Orthodox Church it needs to do, then it's autocephalous status would need to be recognized as autocephalous by the

     Patriarchates of the Orthodox world, yes.

     Q. And a Patriarch doesn't give that, does it?

P46 A. A Patriarch, the Ecumenical Patriarch certainly could. Yes. Yes, it could. The question was did he.

     Q. Yes.

     A. In these Points of Agreement, I don't see the word.

 

(TO BE CONTINUED)

Back to Front Page

 

Back to News

 

Back to Court Proceedings