Back to Front Page

 

Back to News

 

Back to Court Proceedings

 

Part 2

CONTINUATION OF CROSS-EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF WITNESS,

REV. BAZYL ZAWIERUCHA,

BY MR. SMORODSKY:

 

      Mr. SMORODSKY:

P24   Q. When did you become a member of the clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America?

  A. I was received into the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America by Blessed Memory Patriarch Mstyslav,

      and also by -- well, by Patriarch Mstyslav -- I suppose it's a little more complicated than that -- in 19 -- I hope I'm correct --

          I think it was 1990.

      Q. 1990?

      A. Uh-huh.

      Q. He was Patriarch at the time?

      A. No. I actually remember the discussion. He said to me I would like you to do this and this and this. And I said, Vicar, I

          would rather do something else. He said, you know what;  if you don't do what I want you to do, I will resign. I won't go to

          the Ukraine and be Patriarch. The joke there is.

      Q. It's a joke, right?

      A. What I'm trying to say he was not yet, I think, elected. He was just --

      Q. Just about to be elected Patriarch of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church in Ukraine?

      A. That was his election.

           MR. SMORODSKY: For the benefit of the  Court Reporter, we will have many words that need spelling. Please interrupt us,

           and I will always defer to Father Bazyl as to spelling.

     Q. Now, when you became a priest in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America, did you have to go

          through any special training?

     A. I was about to say, I didn't become a priest in the Church. I was received as a priest into the Church.

     Q. What is the distinction, please?

     A. Well, I was not ordained to the priesthood by Patriarch Mstyslav, nor was I ordained. I was already received as a priest into

        the Orthodox Church.

     Q. So you really didn't have to go through any special schooling; you were just accepted?

     A. I was received as an Orthodox through chrismation, which is a sacrament of the Orthodox Church, and received by the

        Patriarch as a priest.

     Q. And in the course of a religious ceremony, correct?

     A. I was by concelebrating at the altar, yes.

     Q. And that was the process of -- what did you call that?

     A. No. Chrismation. I was actually anointed.

     Q. Anointed?

     A. Yes. With chrism, to become Orthodox.

     Q. To become Orthodox.  Now, in your experience in the Orthodox world, the Ukrainian Orthodox world, do priests come

          from the Catholic Church? Are there quite a few situations like yours where Catholic priests come over?

     A. I do know of a number, yes.

     Q. Father Zelinsky that testified earlier in this trial in November, he came over from --

     A. I believe he was a deacon ordained in the Catholic Church, but he was ordained to the priesthood  in the Orthodox Church.

     Q. And do priests come into the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States from other Orthodox jurisdictions?

     A. By the grace of God.

     Q. By the grace of God?

     A. And the Holy Spirit.

     Q. But they come over and are accepted, correct? They do not --

     A. Some are, some aren't.

     Q. Some aren't. Is there an Orthodox Church in Poland?

     A. Yes, indeed, there is an Orthodox Church in Poland.

     Q. Do you co-celebrate with that church?

     A. I have never done it.

     Q. Does the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America co-celebrate on occasion with them?

     A. I have never witnessed anything.

     Q. But do you recognize them?

     A. As?

     Q. As an Orthodox Church?

     A. Yes.

     Q. Now, you testified as to the structure of the UOC-USA. Is your testimony that the Sobor is the entity that decides who

         should  be Bishop?

    A. The Sobor -- the Sobor elects the Bishop from the Council of Bishops, from the -- I thought you said Metropolitan.

  Q. No. Bishop.

    A. The Sobor does elect the Bishop. It does say so in the Constitution, yes.

    Q. Does the Sobor also decide who should be elevated to the rank of Archbishop?

    A. The, as I have witnessed, the Sobor has approved the proposal for someone to be elevated to Archbishop, yes.

    Q. Now, I see that you used the word "approved" as opposed to "elected." Why do you use the word "approved" as opposed

        to "elected?"

    A. Now, within the Church, there is indeed a distinction between, sacramentally between a priest and a Bishop. There is an

     ordination and a consecration of a Bishop to his rank. The position of Archbishop, in no way does that augment the individual

     sacramentally any further. It is an elevation which is purely an organizational, it's a structural part of the Church. It's an elevation

     within the episcopacy. That's why I'm trying to be clear.

   Q. I want you to be clear on this. Does the Sobor play any role in the determination of who the Archbishop is or how – who

    should be elevated to that position?

    A. Well, you see, the curious thing is that according to the Constitution, or rather the structure of the Church, as you notice here

       there are three Eparchies. An Eparchy can be headed either by a Bishop or an Archbishop. Obviously, today, all three are

       headed by archbishops. So, therefore, if that's the case, then the position of Archbishop is an elevation within the Church of

       honor.

     Q. And who makes this elevation of honor? You want to refer to P-20?

    A. Yes.

    Q. Take a look at P-20. Take a look at it and let me know. Take your time.

     A. I haven't -- from Bishop to Archbishop?

     Q. Yes.

     A. I didn't find that. I didn't look. If you could point it out to me?

     Q. I'll bear with you for a few moments.

     A. As I read through the articles, article two under Church Sobor, I don't see mention of elevation to Archbishop.

     Q. Let me ask you this question: Who elevated Archbishop Antony to his position as Archbishop?

     A. I'll have to beg ignorance, your Honor, because I do not know.

     Q. Who elected Archbishop Vsevolod to his position as Archbishop?

     A. I am probably -- I'm trying to be precise, and I think, as I remember at the Sobor, he was acclaimed Archbishop, not two

      Sobors ago, but I can't, you know.

     Q. '98, would that be approximate?

     A. It seems to ring a bell, yeah, yes. There was an acclamation of him as such.

     Q. Now, you used the word "acclamation".

     A. I should know about it because I was taking the minutes, but I really --

     Q. You were the one taking the minutes, huh?

     A. Then. Some of the minutes.

     Q. Now, you were taking the minutes. Was Bishop Vsevolod elected, acclaimed?

     A. He was certainly acclaimed. There was applause. Yes.

     Q. Was elected?

     A. There was no vote taken on that.

     Q. Let me ask you this, Father: You made a face; you are not sure?

     A. Yeah, I'm quite sure, but you made -- I'm making a face because I'm looking at your features. I'm wondering, hmm. My

       children waived good-bye to me as well as saying good luck. May I have some of this water?

     Q. Please.

       MR. SMORODSKY: A moment, Judge?

     Q. Now, can, within the structure of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of  America, can the Sobor reject a

       candidate for Bishop?

     A. If the Sobor needs to elect the Bishop, then I can't see how he would be elected without the Sobor's approval.

     Q. Correct. That would be --

     A. According to --

     Q. According to the Constitution as to what you testified to, the Sobor is the last word as to who becomes a Bishop, correct?

    A. They elect the individual.

    Q. And what the Sobor says is the final word on the election of a Bishop, correct? Father, you are  hesitating.

    A. Well, three bishops can consecrate a Bishop any time they wish, obviously.

    Q. Would that be in accordance with –

    A. The Constitution?

    Q. Yes.

    A. No. The Constitution says for the purposes of this particular Church, he needs to be elected by the Sobor.

    Q. Isn't that the distinguishing feature between the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and a Greek Orthodox Church?

     THE WITNESS: Your Honor, I don't know what the Greek Constitution says.

     THE COURT: Well, it's perfectly appropriate to answer "you do not know" if that is, in fact, the case.

     A. I don't know.

     Q. You don't know?

     A. I really -- I would be guessing.

    Q. Now, is there any other body higher than the Sobor within the Ukrainian Orthodox Church?

    A. Well, no. The Constitution says that it is the supreme -- can I? It is the supreme organ of government of the Ukrainian

         Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.

    Q. Is there a body higher in any way than the Sobor of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church?

    A. Well, it does say that Christ is higher. He is the Head of the Church, and the Church follows all Ecumenical Council's canons,

       structures, and dogmas.

    Q. Other than God, is there anybody else that is higher?

    A. The Church tradition is certainly -- higher, yeah, I suppose. I do understand the question, but I'd like a nuance a little bit, but it

       is the supreme governing authority, the organ of government of the Church, yes.

    Q. Father, would you take a look -- I don't know whether it's paragraph one, two, or three of 1998 Constitution.

    A. Paragraph of which article?

    Q. It's going to take me a little while.

    A. Dealing with what? I might be able to --

     Q. Let me take a look at the document.

      MR. SMORODSKY: Judge, bear with me. Bear with me.

    Q. Thank you, I found it. Paragraph two. Please read paragraph two.

    A. Of Article Two?

    Q. Yes. Paragraph -- Article One, Paragraph Two.

     A. Oh, Article One. Okay.

      "The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America keeps the Dogmas, Canons, Structure and Worship of the

        Holy Ecumenical Orthodox Church; it is autocephalous, independent, in all matters of its life and government, and its rights are

        equal with those of the other Autocephalous Orthodox churches."

 

     Q. The word "autocephalous," what does it mean?

     A. It says here it's -- actually explains it. Autocephalous,  meaning independent.

     Q. That means it is independent of any other body?

     A. In matters of its life and government. Uh-huh.

     Q. Now, are you familiar with the Points of Agreement?

     A. I read them a few years ago.

     Q. Now, they were presented at the 1998 Sobor, were they not?

     A. Uh-huh. Yes, they were.

     Q. And at that time there was substantial discussion about --

     A. Yes.

     Q. -- about the Points of Agreement, correct?

     A. Yes, there were.

    (D-57 marked for identification, Points of Agreement.)

   Q. I show you this document. I would like you to refresh your recollection as to the contents of this document, please.

   A. All eleven points?

    Q. That is correct.

    A. Read through this now?

    Q. Pardon?

    A. You would like me to read through it?

    Q. Yeah. Just to refresh your recollection.

      (Pause in proceedings.)

    A. Yes.

    Q. I call your attention to paragraph 6. In paragraph 6, does that paragraph indicate how bishops are to be elected?

    A. It does speak of election. Canonical election,  yes.

    Q. And what does it say?

    A. Read the whole paragraph?

    Q. No, no. What is your interpretation of what it says?

    A. That the names of the candidates for canonical election as bishops within the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, the names of these

        candidates need to be, once approved by the Sobor, will be submitted to the Ecumenical Patriarchate for canonical election.

    Q. You missed a little part there.

    A. You didn't want me to read the whole thing.

    Q. Okay. Within that paragraph, Father --

    A. Yes?

    Q. -- who makes the nominations?

    A. Okay. Uh-huh. That the Primate, who is the Prime Hierarch of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, consulting the Exarch of the

      Ecumenical Patriarchate in America will submit the slate of candidates for the office of Bishop or Metropolitan to the Sobor.

    Q. That's different than what the Constitution says, does it not? Is it not?

P40 A. This is not what the Constitution says.

(TO BE CONTINUED)

Back to Front Page

 

Back to News

 

Back to Court Proceedings